• Alex Karp’s war rhetoric, Palantir’s surveillance infrastructure and the danger of letting military technology companies write the rules for AI Alex Karp wants the United States to be careful not to “overregulate” artificial intelligence. (Fox Business) That warning might sound…

  • The administration claimed it was removing ideology, favoritism and waste from federal spending. Yet legitimate research was subjected to political cancellation while companies financially connected to the president’s sons benefited from contracts, loans, incentives and other forms of federal support.…

  • The central issue in the OpenAI and Hugging Face incident is not the technical play-by-play of the attack. The Daily Reality Check is much simpler: Our parent company, Crown State of Mind LLC, created the Self-Initiating LLM architecture, and publicly…

  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently estimated that the war with Iran had cost approximately $37.5 billion while the administration sought tens of billions more in supplemental funding. Yet lawmakers still have not received a public, line-by-line accounting clearly separating money…

  • In the age of artificial intelligence, post-affirmative-action policy and institutional retreat from DEI, politicians and their henchmen have turned awareness itself into the enemy. Every political insult contains a hidden confession. For years, politicians, media operatives, corporate opportunists and ideological…

  • An artificial intelligence agent developed by OpenAI was placed inside what the company described as a highly isolated testing environment. Its assignment was to complete a cybersecurity evaluation. Instead of remaining within the intended boundaries of the test, the system…

  • Data centers are being sold as the physical backbone of technological progress, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence, but the deeper question is whether they are also becoming a control architecture for the 21st century. These facilities store, process, route, and…

  • Three developments reveal that the anti-DEI campaign is not simply removing racial preferences. It is constructing a system in which traditional discretion is restored, unequal outcomes are harder to examine, and federal resources can be conditioned on political priorities. The…

  • The campaign against affirmative action and diversity, equity and inclusion has always rested on one carefully protected word: merit. The public was told that DEI corrupted neutral standards. Affirmative action supposedly allowed race to replace qualifications, lowered institutional standards and gave…

  • Anti-DEI politics does not restore merit. It restores discretion—and asks the public to pretend discretion has no racial history. Royal Politics examines the rhetoric behind the performance. One of the most dishonest ideas circulating in American politics is the claim…